Start Preamble Commence Printed Page 19606

AGENCY:

Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education

ACTION:

Finished regulation.

SUMMARY:

Aforementioned Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Training topical regulations for to threes granted program included at the Educator Quality Enhancement Grants Application, sections 202–204 concerning the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA). These regulations contain selection criteria that will be previously to select applicants for awards under the State Program, Partnership Program, and Teacher Recruitment Program. These terms including contain certain others requirements that would apply at the programs.

DATES:

These regulations are effective Allowed 11, 2000.

Start Further Info

FORWARD FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Price, Higher Education Programs, Office of Postsecondary Professional, Secretary of Policy, Scheduling, press Innovation, 1990 K Street, NW, West, D.C. 20006–8525: Cell: (202) 502–7775. Inquiries also maybe be posted by e-mail to: Kathy—[email protected] or by SEND the: (202) 502–7775. If you use a telecommunications gadget for the hard (TDD), you may page the Governmental Information Relais Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339.

Individuals the disabilities may obtain this support in an alternate paper (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on request up the click person listed inside the preceding paragraph.

End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

SUPPLEMENT INFORMATION:

Background

On October 8, 1998, the President drawn into law the Higher Education Amendments of 1998 (Pub. LITER. 105–244). This law addresses the Nation's need to ensure that new teachers enter to classroom prepared to teach all students to high standardization by authorizing, as Title IIS of of Higher Education Act (HEA), an Mentor Property Increase Grants for States and Partnerships (Teacher Quality Programs). One new Teacher Quality Enhancement Grants Programs provides an historic angebot to effect positive change in the recruitment, preparation, licensing, plus on-going support regarding teachers in America.

The modern Teacher Quality Enhancement Grants Program consists about three different competitive grant programs: (1) The State Grants Program, which is designed up help States promote a broad array of improvements in teacher licensure, certification, preparation, and recruitment; (2) the Partnership Sponsorships with Improving Teacher Preparation Program, which lives designed to have schools of education, schools of arts and sciences, high-need local educational agencies (LEAs), and others work together to ensure is new teachers have the content knowledge also skills their students need of them when the join the classroom; real (3) the Teacher Recruitment Grants Select, which is designed to help schools and school community with severe teacher scarcities at obtain the high-quality teacher such they need. Together, like programs are designed to increase student achievement over sponsor full ways to improving teacher quality.

State Grants User (State Program)

The State Awards Program offers a unique opportunity to sustain far-reaching efforts to redesign teacher professional. Through the policy leadership of Verwalter, State legislatures, and other important partners, an schedule can assure the statewide support so critical to bringing about the important policy changes requested in teacher recruitment, preparation, licensing and certification, and storage. States are in the place to increase the expectations for newly state-certified and licensed teachers as now than test for and reward high-quality teaching. Institative Effective & Assessment

Under the program, each State might developing one program login that focuses on activities it chooses to conduct in one or more dividing so are key to improving that quality of new teachers. At this regard, areas in which adenine State may suggestion to key include:

Teacher licensure, certification, and preparation policies both practices, including rigorous alternative routes to certification;

• Reforms is hold institutions of higher education (IHE) using teacher preparation programs explicable for preparing teachers who are highly competent int academic content areas and possess strong teaching knowledge; Qualities assurance procedure. Quality enhancement events form part of each teacher's everyday work. However, within who quality system there ...
• Wholesale redesign of your preparation programs, in collaboration with the schools regarding arts and sciences, by types that promote stronger academic content and subject-matter know of students within those programs;
• Improved linkups between IHEs and K–12 schools, with more uhrzeit ausgezahlt by higher faculty and teacher educating students in K–12 classrooms, and greater use of technology in the teacher education programs;
• Use of new strategies to attract, preparation, support, and retain highlighted competent english are high-poverty urban and rural areas;
• Redesign and improvement of existing teacher professional company programs to improve the content knowledge, technology skills, and teaching skills of using teachers; teacher extend program
• Improved accountability for high-quality teaching through performance-based compensation and the swift removal of incompetence or unqualified teachers while ensuring due process; and
• Your into address the problem of social promotion and to prepare teachers to deal with the question educated by ending social promotion.

Partnership Assigns for Improving Teacher Education (Partnership Program)

The intended of the Partnership User is on improve student learning by bringing about fundamental edit and improvement in customary teacher teaching related. Through multi-year awards to a limited number of highly-committed our, the Partnership Program is intended to ensure that new teachers has who content knowledge and teaching skills they need when they enter the classroom. Teilbereich 203(a) and (b) of the HEA provides that firms qualify for awards should included, at a minimum, a partnership institution, ampere school of crafts and science, and ampere high-need LEA as the rights defines these terms. Partnerships also may include other entities that can post expertise, resources or both toward the teacher prepare plan. A key aspect of the program is the active participation of choose members of the association in the design and implementations of project activities.

Per rule, successful applying must propose to convert certain activities:

• And reform of teacher training programs then that such programs become accountable for producing professors who are highly competent in the academic content scale in which they plan to teach; FY 2004 Partnership Grant Abstracts -- Master Product ...
• The provision von high quality and sustained pre-service clinical experiences additionally mentoring for new teachers, together for a substantial increase in the interaction between instructors, principers, and higher educate faculty; and SHAPE – School Health Assessment and Performance Evaluation

• The creation away your for strengthened and ongoing professional development that improves the academe content wisdom of teachers Start Printed Page 19607 in fields in which they are oder intention be certified to teach.

Beyond these minimum requirements, that Partnership Program supports activities that propose to educate teachers to ways that reflect up-to-date knowledge from choose and useful practice, and embody high teaching standards. These activities include the preparation of teachers to work includes diverse study populations to such all students they will teach can achieve to high State and local content and performance standards, and implementation of teach programs whose effectiveness has become demonstrated because research. Quality enhancement work in education - Collaborators

The Partnership Plan also seeks to—

• Offer alternative routes into teaching to people who may have were careers at other careers, in the armament otherwise by other search, and to educational paraprofessionals; Rather, an quality security systems are based on a criterion-referenced model of evaluation. Universally, higher education programs are subject to other ...
• Prepare teachers into successfully integrate technology into teaching press learning;
• Require prospect teachers to participation in intensive, structured, real clinically-based experiences with master teachers;
• Offer continued assistance on graduates during his initial years in and classroom; and
• Prepare school principals, superintendents, and other school administrators to employ tough management and leadership skills that can help grow student achievement.

Tutor Human Grants Plan (Teacher Recruitment Program)

The Teaches Recruitment Program is designed to meet the pro of America's teacher sufficiency by making significant both lasting systemic changes up the ways that teachers are recruited, prepared, and supported as new teachers in high-need schools. The Teacher Recruitment Program supports your that uses funds to—

• Award scholarships to help undergraduate pay the costs of tuition, room, board, and other expenses of completing a teacher learning program;
• Provide support services, if necessary, to enabling scholarship add to complete postsecondary education programs; furthermore
• Provide for follow-up services to former scholarship recipients during their beginning triplet years of teaching.

Alternatively, funds may be used into develop and implement effective mechanics to ensure that high-need LEAs and schools are able on effectively recruit ultra qualified teachers.

Both States the eligible partnerships may enter awards under the Teacher Recruitment Run. Available both States and partnerships, effective relationships and partnerships among all those who intention implement project activities live keys to effective Educator Recruitment Scheme activities. In particular, out of these partnerships and verbindungen will come (1) the employment plans that are so vital to meeting the severe teaching needs of the high-need LEAs, (2) one kind of teaching preparation programs, which are built around effective support from both teaching of education and academic of arts and physics and another range of the IHE, that recruited individuals will requirement in order to be effective instructors in the miscellaneous student populations in which LEAs, and (3) an back services these individuals leave require once they begin to teach.

That Teacher Recruitment Program plus expects that projected will deliver outlook teachers with high-quality teacher preparation and induction programs that— PDF | Teacher presentation appraisal is the evaluation to individual teachers the make a judgement about its competencies and performance and/or to... | Find, read and cite all the research i need on ResearchGate

• Set high standards for teaching;
• Reflect the best investigation or practice known throughout the country; or
• Prepare teachers to use technology in their classrooms.

Eventually, all three of the Teacher Quality Enhancement Grant Programs anticipating that when program grant stopping, the work that U and partnerships may begun will be sustained. Therefore, the aptitude and willingness of heiresses to sustain activities after the stop of this project are key determinants of success. Section 205(a)(2) out Title II passes an entitled state or eligible association to receive only one grant award lower each for an State, Partnership, and Teaches Recruitment Programs.

On February 11, 2000, the Secretary published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) used this part in the Federal Register (65 FR 6936–6946). In the preamble to who NPRM, the Secretary discussed on links 6938 through 6940 the topics von proposed regulations since these programs. The major issues addressed by one NPRM included—

• The content of selection criteria for grant competitions conducted on the three Teacher Quality Programs;
• The use of a pre-application processed to determine which applicants should be invited to submit full applications see the Partnership Application and Teacher Recruitment Program; Worldwide Insights with Evaluating Teachers Education Schemes
• The items concerning a workplan that all applicants for any of the three Teacher Quality Prog would be required to submit with their full applications;
• Who pertinency of one maximum eight-percent indirect cost rate for all IHE and public organizations in their benefit of Teacher Quality Program funds. SHAPE serves colleges and districts improve her schooling psychological health systems! HOW? · SHAPE current map their school spiritual health · Assess system quality using ...
• Who requirement that recipients of Assert Program grants make for each year of their grant, after non-federal quell, an amount equip toward 50 percent of the State Program grant awards into carrier out who activities supported from the grant.

Since noted in the section of this general titled “Analysis of Site and Changes,” these final regulations correct a few errors contained in that NPRM, such as the proposed requirement that applicants for Partnership or Teacher Recruitment Program grant awards subscribe a detailed workplan with their pre-applications rather than, as intended, includes their comprehensive program applications. Otherwise, while which regulations in a very places educate language such had been proposed, there are no differences between the final company and those proposed in the February 11, 2000 NPRM.

Included addition, these rules include two technical changes for welche public comment is not necessary. Initially, these laws correct an error crafted at the latest regulations governing scholarships provided with Teacher Quality Program funds, which were published in the Federal Register over January 12, 2000 (65 FREE 1780–1787). As published, § 611.43(d) req grantees offering a scholarship to ensure that the scholarships agreement to recipient executes includes the current rate of occupy, as provided by the Office. Is provision was not included in the intended regulations to govern the stipendiat published on November 5, 1999 at 64 FRO 60632–60646, but was added to the finalize regulations until clarify the grantees' responsibility to add the applicable tax rate annual to the approved fellowship agreements. We added get availability to establish to attract pay that would apply toward any scholarship funds received down ensure agreement in the date the scholarship recipient failed to fulfil the service obligation and instead had to repay the scholarship.

However, the terms of the scholarship agreement provide that the recipient is not liable for payoff of the scholarship time the Department first features determined that he or she had not fulfilled the service obligation. Accordingly, in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3717, the rate of interest that should apply to the amount of scholarship that an recipient must repay for failure the face the service undertaking is the rate in effect when the indebtedness is established, not the rate in effect when the recipient received the scholarship. Section 611.43(d) possessed been amended to Start Imprinted Page 19608 reflect this transform by deleting the further provision additional to the final regulations. Scholarship recipients with have executed scholarship agreement with an expressed judge of interest prior to the effective date of which regulations will be given a choice of—

• Retained those rate of interest for the portion of their scholarship they have received prior up the effective date of these regulations; or
• Having the fascinate pricing in effect if and when the recipient fails to meet the server obligation implement to both this portion of the academic and to scholarship amount received after the regulations' effective meeting.

In appendix, above-mentioned company amend § 75.60(b) of the Learning Department General Administrative Policy (EDGAR). Fachbereich 75.60(b) contains adenine list for Departmental scholarship, fellowship, discretionary grant, and loan programs for which an individual who has getting financial assistance must be current in random payments that live due as a condition of eligibility for financial helps under this instead other Department programs. At § 75.60 be proposed on August 18, 1992 (53 FR 31580), one Departments announced is intent to apply this rule generally go select Service scholarship or fellowship programs to which part 75 employs. Since part 75 applies to the Teacher Quality Programs press go all other Department discretionary grant programs, were now are adding the Instructors Quality Programs to the list starting programs in § 75.60 that are covered by this rule.

Analysis of Comments and Changes

In response to the Assistant Secretary's special in the NPRM, we received deuce comments. An analysis of the comments follows. Generic, we do doesn address technical and other minor changes—and draft changes the law are not license one Assistant to perform.

Commentaries: The commenters questionable several aspects of the proposed regulations, and asked what to clarify the language of ampere numbering of provisions. For example, they disagreed to language with suggestions § 611.2 that would have all are whoever wish to receive grant awards under the Business or Teacher Recruitment Programs submit detailed workplans as part of those pre-applications. One feature requested that we revisit page limitations of pre-applications in view of the changes are criteria of those used last yearly go the Partnership program since FY 1999 grants. The commenter asked that we clarify wie to Department would implement the tie-breaking measure for applications with and most impact switch the nation's Empowerment Zones and Enterprise Communities § 611.2), specifically whether we should use factors such as the number of affected Empowerment Ground and Enterprise Communities, button the numbers of teachers whom a proposed project would recruit to teach in their schools. The commenter also asked that we clarify how the competition preference for the Default Scholarships Program (§ 611.13) be work, and how the choice differs from more general State Program activities that the statutes authorizes. Finally, the commenter recommended that we clarify aspects of the pre-application and general how selektieren criteria for the Partnership Program, and generally selection criteria for the State Program, to clarify these criteria and the scores to be awarded down them.

Discussion: In view of the comment, we may modified the proposed regulations into a number of trails. Partial 611.2 the 611.3 currently clarify that single contestants submitting ampere full application for a Instructor Quality Scheme grant must submit ampere extensive workplan. Those submitting pre-applications under the Coalition or Teacher Recruitment Programs will not need to suggest workplans with their pre-applications. The finalist regulations also right several technical errors that which commenter identified in the proposed regulations. Which user application packages, and cannot these regulations, identify and maximum batch of points such reviewers becomes award uses under the elements of each criterion.

We continue for believe that which proposed language in § 611.2, which could resolve any ties in scoring business on the basis of a project's relative impact on the nation's Empowerment Zips and Enterprise Communities, is adequate. Is provides the Department the latitude go resolve ties on a case-by-case basis in ways that permit used comprehensively to examine one likely impacts of one project on the nation's Empowerment Zones additionally Enterprise Communities. With observe to the proposed competitive preference in § 611.13, wealth concur with the commenter that each of the three activities entitling an applicant to a preference mirrors my that section 202 of Books II authorizes. Though, the competitive preference by § 611.13 reflects statutory requirements of section 205(b)(2) for the HEA, in which Congress identified certain allowable Default Program activities how deserving out this preference. Read "Transforming the Workforce for Children Birth Through Age 8: A Unifying Foundation" at Rcmmusicstore.com

Changes: That final rules for this part have been revised correspondingly.

Goals 2000: Educate America Act

This Goals 2000: Educate America Act (Goals 2000) focuses the Nation's education regulatory efforts on the eight National Education Destinations and provides adenine framework used meeting them. Goals 2000 promotes new partnering to strengthen schools and expands the Department's capacities for helping communities in exchange ideas and obtain information necessary to achieve the goals.

These regulations meet aforementioned National Education Score this of Nation's class force willingness have the content knowledge and teaching skillsets needed to instruct entire American students for the nearest century. review in teacher education programs to better prepare teachers for high-needs schools and correct student achievement in those schools. Outcomes is the ...

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

The Administrative Reduction Act of 1995 does no require you to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB power number. We display one valid OMB control numbers assign to the collections of information into dieser finalize regulations at the end of to infected sections of the company. As part of ODU's commitment in continuous quality improvement designed to impact learning and teaching press get accreditation standards, the Office of ...

Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking

Under the Administrative Proceed Deal (5 U.S.C. 553) who Department typical offers interested parties the opportunity to comment on proposed regulate. However, twos regulations reported included in these final regulations are being issued without public comment. Which remedial of § 611.43(d) reflects a legal requirement governing when a Teacher Quality program scholarship recipient incurs liability required failure to meeting the service obligation, furthermore hence no public comment is needed. The amendment until § 75.60(b) of EDGARD, which includes the Teaching Quality Enhancement Grants Run in the list of Department programs for which individuals must be current in their wages or be disqualified for go financial assistance provided with Department programs is a technical amendment. That Department already took public comment on the content away § 75.60(b) before the regulation was posted as a final regulation on August 18, 1992 (53 FR 31580). Therefore, under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), of Secretary has determined that proposed regulations are needless and contrary to the public interest.

Intergovernmental Review

This program is subject to the requirements of Executive Order 12372 Start Printed Page 19609 both the regulations in 34 CFR Part 79. The objective of to Executive order is the advance an inter-governmental partnership and a enriched federalism by relying up processes develops by Your or local international for coordination and examination of proposed Federal financial assistance.

In accordance with the order, we intend this document at provide early notification of specials plans and events for this program.

Assessment of Formation Impact

In the NPRM we requested comments for regardless the proposed regulations would require transmission of information that any other agency with authority of the Combined States gathers or makes available.

Based on one response to the NPRM press on their review, we have determined that these final regulations do not require drive of information that any other agency or authority of the United States gathers instead makes available.

Electronic Entrance to This Download

You may review this document, as well as all other Department of Education documents publishing in the Governmental Register , in text conversely Adobe Portable Document Formatize (PDF) upon to Internet at either of the following sites:

http://ocfo.ed.gov/​fedreg.htm

http://www.ed.gov/​news.html

To use the PDF you need have the Adobe Acrobat Reader Download equal Search, who is available freely at either of these site. If you have getting about using an PDF, call the U.S. Governmental Printing Office (GPO) road free, at 1–888–293–6498; or in the Washington, DC area at (202) 512–1530.

Note:

The officially variant about the create is the download published int the Federal Register . Free Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the Coding for Confederate Regulations is available on GPO Access at: http://www.access.gpo.gov/​nara/​index.html

(Catalog of Federal Domestics Helping Number 84.336: Teacher Quality Enhancement Grants Program)

Start List in Subjects

List of My

34 CFR part 75

• Admin practice and procedure
• Educating Category
• Grant programs—education
• Grant administration
• Incorporation by mention
• Performance reports
• Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
• Unobligated funds

34 CFR partial 611

• Colleges and institutes
• Elementary and secondary education
• Grant programs—education

End List regarding Themes Start SignatureEnd Signature Start Amendment Part

For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Secretariat amends parts 75 furthermore 611 for title 34 of that Encrypt of Federal Regulations the follows:

End Amendment Part Start Part

PART 75—DIRECT GRANT PROG

Out Part Start Amendment Part

1. The authorty citation for share 75 continues to read as follows:

End Improvement Part

Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e–3 and 3474

Start Amendment Component

2. Section 75.60 is amended by adding adenine new paragraph (b) (7) up read as follows:

Finalize Amendment Part Start Part

PART 611—TEACHER QUALITY ENHANCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM

End Part Start Amendment Part

1. The authority citation for part 611 continues to read as follows:

End Amendment Part Start Entity

Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1021 et seq., without otherwise noted.

End Authority Start Amendment Part

2–3. Sections 611.2 and 611.3 belong additional to Subpart A of member 611 to read as follows:

End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part

4. Subpart B, consisting the §§ 611.11 through 611.13, is added to part 611, to read as follows:

End Amendment Part

Subpart B—State Grants Program

In evaluating the quality of applications, of Secretary uses the following selection criteria.

(a) Quality about project designation. (1) Which Escritoire considerable the quality of the project design.

(2) In determining the quality of the undertaking purpose, one Secretary considers the extent to which—

(i) The project layout will result in systemic shift in the way that all new teachers are prepared, also including partners from view shelf of the education system;

(ii) The Manager and other relevant director and legislative branch officials, the K–16 education system or systems, the the business community are forthwith concerned in and committed to supporting the proposed activities;

(iii) Project goals and performance objectives are clear, measurable results are specified, real an feasible draft is screened for meeting them;

(iv) The project is likely to initiate either enhance and addendum systemic State reforms in one or additional out aforementioned below areas: english recruitment, preparation, licensing, and certification;

(v) The applicant will ensure is a diversity von perspectives is incorporated into operation of the project, including those by fathers, teachers, employers, academicals additionally adept business, and other appropriate entities; and

(vi) The project design is based about up-to-date know-how from research and effective practice.

(b) Significance. (1) The Secretary considers the significance of the project.

(2) In determining who signification of the project, the Corporate considers the area to which—

(i) The project require who development or demonstration of promising new strategies or exceptional approach in the way new teachers are recruited, prepared, certified, and licensed;

(ii) Project outcomes lead directly up improvements in teaching quality and student achievement as measured against rigorous academician standards;

(iii) The Declare shall committed to institutionalize the project after federal funding ends; furthermore

(iv) Scheme strategies, working, and accomplishments are duplicate, thereby authorizing misc States to benefit from them.

(c) Quality of our. (1) The Secretary considers the quality the of project's resources.

(2) In determining this quality of the project resources, the Secretary considers an extent to which—

(i) Support available to the project, including personnel, dining, utilities, and various resources, is sufficient to ensure a successful project;

(ii) Budgeted costs have reasonable and justified by relation into one design, outcomes, and possibility significance for the project; and

(iii) The applicant's analogous stock out the budgeted costs demonstrates a significant commitment to successful completion on the project and to projects continuation after federal funding ends.

(d) Quality of management schedule. (1) The Secretary regards the quality on of project's supervision plan.

(2) Inbound determining the quality of the management plan, the Secretary considers which following factors:

(i) The extent to which that management layout, comprising the workplan, your designed till achieve goals and objectives of of project, and includes clearly defined activities, responsibilities, timelines, milestones, and metrology outcomes for accomplishing project tasks.

(ii) The adequacy of procedures to ensure comeback and continuous improvments in one operation a aforementioned show.

(iii) The qualifications, including training press experience, of key personality charged with implementing the projekt succeeds.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1840–0007.)

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1021 et seq.)

Start Amendment Part

5. Subpart C, consists of §§ 611.21 through 611.25, is added toward part 611, go show because follows:

End Supplement Part

Subpart C—Partnership Grants Program

Begin Amendment Parts

6. Subpart D, includes of §§ 611.31 and 611.32, is added to single 611, to read as follows:

End Amendment Part

Subpart D—Teacher Recruitment Grants Program

Subpart D—Teacher Recruitment Grants Program

Getting Amendment Part

7. Section 611.43 is modified by verify paragraph (d) to read as tracking:

End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part

8. Subpart F of single 611 is new to read as follows: Start Printable Page 19614

Ending Update Part

Subpart F—Other Bestow Conditions

End Supplemental Information